|
PORNOGRAPHY
The Internet was created in the USA and in part has inherited a US sense of morality , at least as far as some are concerned . This morality is based in the Puritan ethic and can be seen it the approach to sexuality and nudity verses violence in movies and on the stage within the US . Our censorship pages deal more fully with this topic . Republican ( US - conservative ) Governments seem to be obsessed with this subject . Obscenity lies with the First World Third World divide , environmental degradation , human rights issues and jingoistic nationalism . These factors have led to two World Wars and the death of millions . Now we are looking at the same factors operating in the various Middle East disputes . Bearing these factors in mind the argument over pornography can be given a sense of proportion and balance which is generally lacking elsewhere . Spanking , in it's various forms , has been a part of of human existence for thousands of years , no amount of censorship will suppress it . It has it's place in the sun and brings enjoyment to many of all ages throughout the world . A spanking is not necessarily experienced as being painful , it can be quite the opposite . With informed , freely given , adult consent spanking at all but the most severe levels can not be abuse . Within the spanking community sadists are not particularly popular and tend to be on the fringes . There is little likelihood of depravity or corruption . In fact there appears to be a lack of masked spankers terrorising the streets of suburbia . The current spate of church run organisational child molestation cases do not seem to involve spanking as a complaint . Most true spankers only have this interest and are the same as the rest of their communities otherwise . Since the Clinton Administration the Porn Industry has thrived and have really pushed the limits , for no apparent reason other than greed . Spankoz has no support for , or connection with , these people . Not only are they offensive to the average person they are offensive in their internet business practices ( see our CUSTOMER page ) . We particularly object to their misuse of the term SPANKING in the way they promote their sites and products . Adult spanking can offend some and we , like most sites , make an attempt to warn visitors of our content .
This photograph may be offensive to some because it :
All of the above are true , but this result presumably is the result of a freely consented to activity and is typical of spanking activity . The question of pain is one for the recipient and even if tears were shown , the picture is still acceptable . We believe that this , similar images , stories and other like content are a legitimate expression of an adult interest in spanking .
We do not engage in the debate concerning the spanking of children because of the lack of consent in most cases and the emotionality associated with the subject .
We are an consensual adult spanking site .
Bondage
and Bikinis: The Case of the Pin-up Queen and the Two Girl Photographers
Note : This page was written some time ago and now , in 2006 , it seems that general standards have gone down further , led by the media , especially the television and film industry . The use of profanities is a good index of how a society is functioning in this area . Another result is the recent rise of religious fundamentalism , based on countering declining public morality .
|